What is the need to view defects "per million", can % view not suffice?
Defects per million gives a better insight into defect severity. This magnifies defects and makes the performance look better (if the process is efficient). For example, you can talk that your process has only 1% defects. When talking in terms of percentage, the severity of defects does not seem much. Defects look manageable!!!
Parts per million magnifies the defects and shows a more realistic picture. When translated to PPM, 1% is equal to 10, 000 defects per million! Now this seems too big a value to neglect.
Instead of PPM, a better way to denote variation is by calling points as defects. Thus, we have DPMO (Defects per million opportunities) instead of PPM.
Scraps from various sources and my own writings on Generative AI, AGI, Digital, Disruption, Agile, Scrum, Kanban, Scaled Agile, XP, TDD, FDD, DevOps, Design Thinking, etc.
Page Hits
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If we already have automation, what's the need for Agents?
“Automation” and “agent” sound similar — but they solve very different classes of problems. Automation = Fixed Instruction → Fixed Outcome ...
- 
Requirements Analysis -- Business requirements document or business requirements specification System Design -- Systems requireme...
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment