Scraps from various sources and my own writings on Generative AI, AGI, Digital, Disruption, Agile, Scrum, Kanban, Scaled Agile, XP, TDD, FDD, DevOps, Design Thinking, etc.
Page Hits
Showing posts with label Design Sprint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Design Sprint. Show all posts
Monday, January 07, 2019
Friday, January 04, 2019
Design Sprint
Courtesy: Jake Knapp
- A Design Sprint is a time-constrained, 5 phase process using design thinking to reduce the risk of bringing a product, service or a feature into the market.
- Savioke's 5 Day Process is summarized below: [Savioke considered dozens of ideas for their robot, and then used structured decision making to select the strongest solution to prototype and test the idea with customers]. Objective was to come up with a prototype that delivered one specific functionality (delivery a single toothbrush to a guest).
- 1st the team cleared a full week off their calendars with OOO replies.
- Manufactured a deadline
- Made arrangements with hotel for a live test on the Friday.
- Now there were only 4 days to design and test.
- Day 1: Savioke reviewed everything they knew about the problem. [they reasserted the importance of Guest satisfaction after every service, which the hotel religiously tracks]
- Savioke created a map to identify biggest risks. (A Customer Journey Map kind of -- Guest meets robot, robot gives customer toothbrush, guest acknowledges the receipt, etc.). There may also be other points where Guest-robot interaction could take place. Team had to prioritize where to spend the effort based on the risk it carried.
- Some challenges: Where to start (eventually team chose The Moment of Delivery, Should we make robots appear smarter - some people may try to interact with the robot and if they didn't respond people might be disappointed, etc.
- Day 2: Team switched to problem solving. Instead of brainstorming each member came up with own solutions -- CEO, Head of Bus Dev, Chief Robotics Engg, everyone participated and came up with own solution.
- Day 3 (goal was which ideas to test and document potential soln in detail so that only the execution is left out): Sketches, notes on conf hall walls, old ideas discarded, 23 competing solutions. Voting and structured decision to narrow down ideas.
- Day 4: Execution. programmed and tuned up robot's movements (laptop and playstation controller, sound effects, face mock up.
- Day 5: Live Test. Lined up interviews with guests, duct-tape webcams etc.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
If we already have automation, what's the need for Agents?
“Automation” and “agent” sound similar — but they solve very different classes of problems. Automation = Fixed Instruction → Fixed Outcome ...
- 
Requirements Analysis -- Business requirements document or business requirements specification System Design -- Systems requireme...
 
 
 
