Next Layer: Fine-Tuning
Where RAG retrieves knowledge dynamically, fine-tuning actually modifies the model’s brain — it teaches the LLM new patterns or behaviors by updating its internal weights.
⚙️ How Fine-Tuning Works
- 
Start with a pretrained model (e.g., GPT-3.5, Llama-3, Mistral). 
- 
Prepare training data — examples of how you want the model to behave: - 
Inputs → desired outputs 
- 
e.g., “User story → corresponding UAT test case” 
 
- 
- 
Train the model on these examples (using supervised learning or reinforcement learning). 
- 
The model’s weights are adjusted, internalizing the new style, tone, or domain language. 
After fine-tuning, the model natively performs the desired task without needing the examples fed each time.
⚖️ RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Clear Comparison
| Aspect | RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) | Fine-Tuning | 
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Adds external info at runtime | Alters model weights via training | 
| When Used | When data changes often or is large | When you need consistent behavior or reasoning style | 
| Data Type | Documents, databases, APIs | Labeled prompt–response pairs | 
| Cost | Low (no retraining) | High (GPU time, expertise, re-training) | 
| Freshness | Instantly updatable | Requires re-training to update | 
| Control | You control retrieved sources | You control reasoning patterns | 
| Example Use | Ask questions about new policies | Teach model to write test cases in your company’s format | 
| Analogy | Reading from a manual before answering | Rewriting the brain to remember the manual forever | 
🧩 Combining Both: RAG + Fine-Tuning = Domain-Native AI
The real power comes when both are used together:
| Layer | Role | 
|---|---|
| Fine-Tuning | Teaches the model how to think — e.g., how to structure a UAT test case, how to handle defects, your tone/style. | 
| RAG | Gives it the latest knowledge — e.g., current epics, Jira stories, or Salesforce objects from your live data. | 
So the LLM becomes:
A fine-tuned specialist with a live retrieval memory.
🧬 Example: In Your AGL Salesforce / UAT Context
| Step | Example | 
|---|---|
| Fine-tuning | You fine-tune the LLM on 1,000 existing UAT test cases and business rules. Now it understands your structure and tone. | 
| RAG layer | You connect it to Jira and Confluence via embeddings, so when you ask, “Generate UAT test cases for Drop-3 Call Centre Epics,” it retrieves the latest epics and acceptance criteria. | 
| Result | You get context-aware, properly formatted, accurate UAT cases consistent with AGL’s standards. | 
That’s enterprise-grade augmentation — the model both knows how to think like your testers and knows what’s new from your systems.
🧠Summary Table
| Capability | Base LLM | + RAG | + Fine-Tuning | + Both | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General reasoning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 
| Access to private or new data | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠ (only if baked in) | ✅ | 
| Domain vocabulary & formats | ⚠ | ⚠ | ✅ | ✅ | 
| Updatable knowledge | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | 
| Low hallucination | ⚠ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅✅ | 
| Cost to build | – | Low | Medium–High | Medium | 
🚀 The Strategic Rule of Thumb
| If your problem is... | Then use... | 
|---|---|
| “Model doesn’t know the latest information.” | ✅ RAG | 
| “Model doesn’t behave or write like us.” | ✅ Fine-Tuning | 
| “Model doesn’t know and doesn’t behave correctly.” | ✅ Both | 
That’s the progressive architecture:
- 
RAG extends knowledge. 
- 
Fine-tuning embeds behavior. 
- 
Together, they form the foundation for enterprise-grade AI systems. 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment