Friday, November 10, 2017

Agile Product Quality

Ensuring Product Quality in Agile

In his seminal book “Out of Crisis”, Edward Deming, the Quality Guru, summarized the Quality Management philosophy in 14 points. One of which is below:

Talking about inspection, he says “Cease dependence on inspection to achieve quality. Eliminate the need for inspection on a mass basis by building quality into the product in the first place”.

The bottom line is, inspections / reviews are an act too late into the product lifecycle, since they are done after the product reaches certain maturity. Therefore at best they can be a catalyst, but not by themselves assure quality. Not so different in this new world of Agile Development as well where inspections, reviews or another mechanism are all considered extrinsic to product development and so cannot completely assure product quality. Product quality it appears is built into the product.

Product development teams take charge of product quality assurance by adopting certain core engineering practices, thereby delivering Outcomes, not merely Outputs. The understanding being the quality of a product is intrinsic and is built into the product. Extending the logic, therefore, built-in quality practices will alone be able to improve product quality.

Some of the key aspects of Product Quality in the Agile context and how they are achieved are discussed below.

1. Requirements Traceability: Requirements traceability is intrinsic to Agile framework. There is a natural and strong hierarchy if we may call so, of user needs from Epic, Feature to User Story. And from there to DoD and further traceability to acceptance tests.

2. Architectural Runway: In Agile, architecture is done incrementally starting with an emergent design, which can be improved as sprints progress. This incremental approach to architecture instead of big-bang results in a model that is robust, yet is flexible to future changes.

3. Verification , Validation: Backlog grooming, Release Planning, Sprint planning, Daily stand ups, Product demos, and retrospective meetings – all these key Agile ceremonies are done very frequently and iteratively in Agile and can be seen as Verification and Validation activities. Backlog grooming and sprint planning vigorously allow for debate on the needs, technical feasibility, prioritization, etc. The very fact that there is intense discussion around these topics and an AskàReviewàFollow-up loop ensures there is no ambiguity on the needs. Stand ups, retrospectives, and the level of communication among team members ensures the solutions, approach, plans etc. are continuously discussed & verified, and adapted. Product Demo ensures validation happens.

4. TDD and Refactoring: Only so much of code is written as to pass the written test case. This test-first approach guarantees the code has fewer bugs, is relatively clean, and most importantly, results in a code that is easy to maintain, flexible and can be easily extended

5. Pair programming: makes sure that there is live critique – reflect, correct, and progress on the code. This leads to increased code discipline, better code and collective code ownership, all of which benefits team cohesiveness.

6. Continuous Integration: Continuous integration ensures build and integration errors are detected early, easy to find and fix bugs, accelerates the build process, and results in full code visibility.

7. Continuous Delivery: Ensures enhancements, bug fixes, are rapidly and reliably pushed to production for a seamless experience to customers.

8. Definition of Done: Definition being binary – either achieved or not achieved, clearly removes ambiguity of what has and has not been achieved at Story, Sprint, Release levels.

9. Acceptance Criteria: Similar to DoD, Acceptance Criteria unambiguously gives the development team clarity on what it would take for the user story to be accepted as complete. Moreover, acceptance criteria can be easily translated to manual or automated test cases.

10. Continuous Improvement: Sprint on Sprint, Agile teams reflect and adapt their practices to suit and better their performance. Agile retrospectives in this sense, by design, allow and promote continuous improvement.

Product quality in Agile is a combined ownership, fostered by collaborative and proactive behaviors of team members.

Contract-First Design OR Design by Contract (DbC)


  • "DbC Is an approach for designing software. 
  • It prescribes that software designers should define formal, precise and verifiable interface specifications for software components, which extend the ordinary definition of abstract data types with preconditions, post conditions and invariants. These specs are referred to as Contracts…
  • The Design by Contract (DBC) software development technique ensures high-quality software by guaranteeing that every component of a system lives up to its expectations. 
  • Bertrand Meyer developed DBC as part of his Eiffel programming language."

Note: Double quoted text indicates the content is sourced from another site. Three essentials of DbC are:

1. Preconditions
2. Postconditions
3. Class invariants


  • Central to DBC is the notion of an assertion -- a Boolean expression about the state of a software system.
  • At runtime we evaluate the assertions at specific checkpoints during the system's execution. 
  • n a valid software system, all assertions evaluate to true. In other words, if any assertion evaluates to false, we consider the software system invalid or broken.
  • DBC's central notion somewhat relates to the #assert macro in C and C++ 

Extreme manufacturing (XM)

"The name was coined in 2012 by Joe Justice, founder of Wikispeed, and Marcin Jakubowski, founder of Open Source Ecology, as a take-off of the name extreme programming (XP), a software development methodology."


"eXtreme Manufacturing (XM) is an iterative and incremental framework for manufacturing improvement and new product development that was inspired by the software development methodology Scrum and the systematic waste-elimination (lean) production scheduling system Kanban"

The 10 core principles of XM are:

1. Optimize for change
2. OO, Modular Architecture
3. TDD
4. Contract-First Design
5. Design iteration
6. Agile h/w Design Patterns
7. CI Development
8. Continuously deployed development
9. Scaling patterns
10. Partner patterns

Sunday, October 29, 2017

The AI Podcast on SoundCloud...

The Agile Acronym Overload

As more and more frameworks get added they feel less like a valuable contribution and more like a way to make money.

When you go back to the core of Agile, it’s a simple set of four principles. You don’t need a replication of the London Underground tube map to understand it. (Referring to Deloitte's Agile Landscape)

Agile Framework is an oxymoron. If you adhere too strictly to any one framework, you’ve ceased to be Agile.

Agile is what you make it, not what people tell you it should be.

Agile doesn’t - and shouldn’t - work everywhere

-- Roisi Proven, Red Badger.

https://blog.red-badger.com/blog/2017/1/13/the-less-safe-dad-acronyms-in-agile


Visualizing Next Word Prediction - How to LLMs Work?

 https://bbycroft.net/llm